1. Calling the Roll. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Euille, and the City Clerk called the roll; all the members of Council were present. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ 2. Public Discussion Period. (a) Bert Ely, 200. S. Pitt Street, expressed concern about the financial aspect of the proposed waterfront plan, noting that crucial aspects of the plan are unknown or highly questionable as to completeness or reasonableness. Before adopting the plan, Council should direct that the financial aspects of the plan be reviewed by independent experts, and Council needs to put the breaks on the plan until it has much more complete and realistic revenue cost estimates. (b) Poul Hertel, 1217 Michigan Court, commended Council for the comments made at the waterfront work session. He said they need to know what is on the table, as there is no implementation strategy to the plan, and there are two outside entities that affect the plan and it needs clarity on what they both intend to do - one is the Old Dominion Boat Club and the other is the Federal Government. He asked if it does not get the parking lot, does it still get the building, and if it does get the parking lot and building, who will pay for it and how much will it cost. (c) Don Buch, 389 Livermore Lane, said he previously requested that the public be provided a cost-benefit analysis for the BRAC project, and he asked how that is progressing. He said he also asked that this be placed on the agenda for next week's BRAC Advisory Group meeting, and it did not get put on the final agenda and he was advised that the City had determined it was not an appropriate topic to be pursued by the Advisory Group. (d) Nancy Jennings, 2115 Marlboro Drive, president, Seminary Hill Association, said the Seminary Hill Association has enjoyed the support of City Council to preserve their neighborhoods from cut-through traffic and have objected to the addition of any new traffic onto Seminary Road from I-395. She asked Council to reaffirm its support for the protection of their neighborhoods as it did in Resolution 2366 when it opposed HOV off-ramps at Seminary Road. She urged Council to consider options such as a redesign of the interchange as an urban diamond or putting an HOV off-ramp onto another better functioning interchange that has fewer topographical challenges, such as King or Duke Streets. (e) Shirley Downs, 1007 N. Vail Street, spoke of the proposal from VDOT, which suggests that the access ramp should begin at Sanger and go up, and they are concerned that the proposal would remove the trees, which have screened their view of 395 and provided noise mitigation and visual pollution. If a sound barrier is put up, they are recommending that it be made as pretty as possible and still have trees on the Van Dorn side to screen it. She said the fixing of the intersections by providing the access ramp does nothing to mitigate the traffic that is going to spill over onto the surrounding intersections. (f) Michael Hobbs, 419 Cameron Street, spoke to the legal implications of the waterfront plan, noting that land use on three of the four sites proposed for redevelopment is governed in part by the settlement agreements of the early 1980's and would apparently not permit the hotels proposed for the Robinson terminal site or the restaurant building in Waterfront Park. Implementation of the plan would require amendment of those settlement agreements. He noted that changes to the public policy agreement governing Waterfront Park should be undertaken only with the most careful advice of the Planning Department and the City Attorney. (g) Carol James, 1000 N. Vail Street, said that as they look at the VDOT proposal before Council, they will still have a failed intersection going into and out of BRAC 133. Proposal F represents failure and they have not improved the problem with the expenditure of $100 million. They have no effective way into and out of BRAC, even after the expenditure of the $100 million. The approach should still be no way and it should not go forward with a proposal until it can project success from the proposal. (h) Julie Crenshaw Van Fleet, 26 Wolfe Street, spoke of the work sessions between the Planning Commission, City Council and Planning staff on the waterfront plan, and said it was disappointing that no questions were asked but it was just expressed how nice it looked. She said questions were asked from the Planning Commission to the Planning staff regarding the properties that were involved, but she didn't think everyone was all for the plan and it was a misrepresentation to the Planning Commission and to the public to be saying that. While it may say they are interested in residential and quality of life, that is at the bottom of the list and is the last thing that was mentioned. When it gets a list of things to be fixed, flooding should be at the top of the list and not the bottom. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ OTHER 3. Presentation by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and Consideration of the City Staff Report on the Proposal from the Virginia Department of Transportation to Construct a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Ramp (Alternative F) at Seminary Road and I-395. City Council: 1. endorsed the recent action by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to advance implementation of a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/transit ramp Alternative F at Seminary Road and I-395; and 2. indicated that Council also concurs with the elimination of Alternative G from further analysis. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ REPORTS OF BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES ACTION CONSENT CALENDAR (4-5) Planning Commission 4. SPECIAL USE PERMIT #2010-0078 4536-4598 EISENHOWER AVENUE CLAREMONT INVESTORS, LLC Public Hearing and Consideration of a request to extend an expiration date of an existing special use permit (SUP #2003-0118); zoned OCM (100)/Office Commercial Mixed Use (100). Applicant: Claremont Investors, LLC, represented by M. Catherine Puskar, attorney PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend Approval 6-0 5. SPECIAL USE PERMIT #2010-0082 1012 KING STREET RESTAURANT Public Hearing and Consideration of a request to operate a restaurant; zoned KR/King Street Retail. Applicant: Boccato, LLC, represented by Rob Shelton PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend Approval w/amendments 6-0 END OF ACTION CONSENT CALENDAR City Council adopted the action consent calendar. The approval was as follows: 4. City Council approved the Planning Commission recommendation. 5. City Council approved the Planning Commission recommendation. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY MANAGER 6. Public Hearing on a Report of the City Council Naming Committee on the Proposal to Name the City Park at 3500 Jefferson Davis Highway in Honor of Ruby Tucker. (#8, 2/8/11) City Council adopted the report of the City Council Naming Committee and approved the Naming Committee's recommendation to name the park located at 3500 Jefferson Davis Highway Ruby Tucker Park. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ REPORTS OF BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES (continued) Planning Commission (continued) 7. TEXT AMENDMENT #2011-0001 VARIANCE STANDARD Public Hearing and Consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance to revise the standard for the grant of a variance, consistent with Virginia law. Staff: Planning and Zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend Approval w/amendments 6-0 City Council approved the Planning Commission recommendation. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ 8. TEXT AMENDMENT #2011-0003 PROHIBITED USES Public Hearing and Consideration of changes to the zoning ordinance, including to the NR zone and the Mount Vernon Overlay Zone to clarify that pawn shops, check cashing and payday loan businesses are prohibited and to add title loan companies to the group of prohibited uses. Staff: Planning and Zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Recommend Approval 6-0 City Council approved the Planning Commission recommendation. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ 9. DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT #2010-0028 SPECIAL USE PERMIT (TMP) #2011-0002 800 NORTH MADISON STREET THE MADISON Public Hearing and Consideration of amendments to a previously approved development special use permit, with site plan, to make a series of changes, a decrease in retail spaces; an increase in residential units; a decrease in the number of parking spaces; revisions to amenities; revisions to green building requirements; changes to the roof treatment, changes to the configuration and design of courtyards, building facades, and streetscape, and an amendment to the transportation management plan. Applicant: EQR-Madison & Henry, LLC by Duncan Blair, attorney PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DSUP: Recommend Approval 6-0 SUP: Recommend Approval 6-0 City Council approved the Planning Commission recommendation. Council Action:_________________________________________________________ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 10. Public Hearing, Second Reading and Final Passage of an Ordinance to Amend and Reordain Section 13-1-17 (Indecent Exposure) of Chapter 1 (General Offenses), Title 13 (Miscellaneous Offenses) of the Code of the City of Alexandria, Virginia, 1981, as Amended to Specifically Exempt Breastfeeding from the Ordinance Regarding Indecent Exposure. (#9, 2/08/11) [ROLL-CALL VOTE] City Council adopted the ordinance to specifically exempt breastfeeding from the ordinance regarding indecent exposure. (ORD. NO. 4706) Council Action:_________________________________________________________ REPORTS OF BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES (continued) DEFERRAL/WITHDRAWAL CONSENT CALENDAR Planning Commission (continued) None. END OF DEFERRAL/WITHDRAWAL CONSENT CALENDAR Council Action:_________________________________________________________ The meeting adjourned at 12:27 p.m. Note: The action docket is a summary of Council's meeting deliberations prepared largely for staff follow-up. Formal minutes of the meeting, when approved by Council become the official record of the meeting and of Council decisions made at the meeting.